However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 15:50 on July 10, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 15:50 on the 15:50 on the ground that the victim D (the age of 58) who is the director of the manpower office had an inappropriate relationship with the prior wife that was divorced by the Defendant; (b) entered the above manpower office, and entered the above manpower office, and opened the rubber 30 centimeters; (c) opened the above manpower office, the victim et al. with the victim et al. on the back of the floor; and (d) the victim et al. al. al. on the back of the floor by the rubber typ of the victim et al.

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous articles with the victim for about four weeks of medical treatment, and suffered injuries such as the 1 cage cage cage cage fages.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to seized articles, photographic materials and photographic materials of victims;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da15448, Apr. 2, 2009; Supreme Court Decision 2009Da1548, Apr. 2, 20

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( repeatedly considering the aforementioned circumstances);

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;