손해배상(자)
1. The Defendant’s KRW 58,728,00 for the Plaintiff and its related KRW 5% per annum from September 15, 2014 to July 7, 2017.
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The facts of recognition 1) B are as follows: (a) C bus around 20:40 on September 15, 2014 (hereinafter “Defendant bus”).
(ii) A driver, while driving and driving, left left the trile distance front of the bus stop in the U.S., U.S., U.S. at the port side of the U.S. bus, left the trile to the T.S. bus stop (hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”). A driver, who was going to the port side of the U.S. bus, f. at the port side of the Defendant bus, f.e., the front side of the D., the U.S. bus driver’s driving f. at the port side (hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”).
2) The Plaintiff suffered injury to the left-hand laver laver laver, the left-hand laver laver laver laver, etc. due to the instant accident.
3) The defendant is a mutual aid business operator who entered into a motor vehicle mutual aid agreement with respect to the defendant bus. The defendant is a mutual aid business operator who entered into a motor vehicle mutual aid agreement with respect to the defendant bus. The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap evidence No. 1, Eul evidence No. 2-1,
B. According to the fact of recognition of liability, the Plaintiff was injured due to the operation of the Defendant bus, and the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages incurred by the Plaintiff as the mutual aid business operator of the Defendant bus, barring any special circumstance.
C. The limitation of liability, however, even though the plaintiff was proceeding on a bend road as well as the plaintiff was in operation of a yellow-off signal at the front bank intersection, and thus, he was obligated to drive the bend road at the right speed and to reduce the speed, and even though he was found to turn left at the front bank intersection, he proceeded without reducing the speed by changing the vehicle from two lanes to one lane on the front bank road, and even though he was found to turn left at the right speed, he did not operate the steering gear properly due to the speed of the front bank, and came to conflict with the rear of the defendant bus.
Since the Plaintiff’s error contributed to the occurrence of the instant accident and the expansion of damages, it shall be taken into account, but the Defendant bus entered the lawsuit and left to the left.