However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around August 10, 2012, the Defendant: (a) was at the construction site of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B, and (b) was the victim C, “The head of the building site is the head of the building site; (c) was paid with money from the advance payment; and (d) was transferred from the victim to the bank account in the name of the Defendant’s name on August 16, 2012; and (d) was transferred five million won to the bank account in the name of the Defendant’s name on October 17, 2012.

However, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to transfer the scrap metal to the victim, because the Defendant was not in a position to dispose of the scrap metal at the construction site or at the construction site.

In the end, by deceiving the defendant, the 10 million won was stolen by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Certification letter of E preparation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a scrap metal purchase contract;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act or more (i.e., the defendant has no previous conviction in the same kind);