However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 3, 2012, at around 06:25, the Defendant repeatedly listened to the 'D' operated by the victim C in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B, with the victim, that “no friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend frith friend frith frith frith frith frith frith frith frith frith frith frith frith frith,

As a result, the Defendant damaged the amount of the victim's property and inflicted violence on the victim, who is a dangerous product, and caused the victim to suffer approximately four weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to C of the protocol of prosecutorial statement;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 366 (Aggravated Punishment of Damage), 262, 261, 260 (1), and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (a person who assaults himself/herself with dangerous articles), and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act include the following: (a) the Defendant had the record of having received a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for the crime of injury on September 16, 2009; (b) the victim does not want the punishment of the Defendant; and (c) the circumstances, means, methods, and results of the instant crime, etc., the sentence shall be

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.