Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On July 21, 2015, the Defendant posted a letter stating that “A” list the victim at the Kakao Kakao Stockholm conference room of approximately 100 unspecified persons, including the victim B (the victim B (the victim), and “A” list the victim, and “A” list at the single cell level of the same kind of DNA franchise B, which is living without any awareness of the concept of consciousness, there is no problem in the national inspection, and there is shock.”

On July 23, 2015, the Defendant continued to designate the victim at the Kakao Stockholm Stockholm Office, “The Council for Party Members of the EE Party,” and publicly insultd the victim by posting a statement stating, “Although it is not a factory product with F of the B Illegal Election Crime F, it does not mean that the Defendant is not a factory product with F of the B Illegal Election Crime, but rather, it is difficult to pay attention.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each police statement protocol to B;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;