However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 24, 2013, the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol on the street “Eju” located in the Da, the Defendant brought an objection against the fact that the Victim C (25 years of age) and the Defendant’s daily driving of the Defendant are a punishment for a fluor; (b) met the victim’s face with the victim’s vision attached to the victim; (c) was able to take the face of the victim’s body by drinking the victim’s face; and (d) was 10 times of the victim’s face by continuously going over the floor with the victim’s body while going beyond the floor.

As a result, the defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the Korean left-hand pelvis complex and the pelpelpelel complex, which require approximately six weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F, G, and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 257 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing grounds under Article 32(1)3 and (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Lawsuits to Dismiss Compensation Orders shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant is led to a crime, the fact that the defendant has no record of being punished more than a suspended sentence, the fact that two million won has been deposited for the victim, etc., and the fact that the details of damage have not been less and less than that of the victim, and the fact that the details of damage have not been less than that of the victim, and other unfavorable circumstances