A. The sentence imposed by the lower court (one year and eight months of imprisonment and one hundred thousand won of fine, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. With respect to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, among the crimes of this case, the crime of this case is not likely to be committed in light of the method and form of the crime, such as preparing tools, etc. to be used by the defendant in advance for opening the entrance, and intrusioning upon only specific places such as the front door, and theft of property, etc., the nature of the crime is not good. The defendant is going to commit the crime of this case again during the suspension period of execution due to the same larceny, the number of crimes is high, disadvantageous circumstances such as the defendant's confession and depth, the defendant's confession, and reflects in depth, each of the losses of this case are not large, and the amount of damage of this case is not so big, and the defendant must support some victims and children who have a disability and disability, and other favorable circumstances such as age, character, environment, motive, motive, means, and consequence of the crime, and various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the situation before and after the crime.

3. In conclusion, since each appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.