Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

On November 12, 2007, the Defendant has the record of violating the provision prohibiting driving of alcohol on at least two occasions by receiving a summary order of a fine of one million won due to a violation of road traffic law in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon-cheon, and on May 24, 2013, receiving a summary order of a fine of six million won or more for the same crime in the same court.

On May 23, 2018, the Defendant driven C, under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 500 meters from May 23, 2018 to the Geumsan River located in the Singu Sin Sin Sin Sin Sin Sin Sinsin Sin Sinsin, C, while under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.087% from May 23, 2018.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Fact-finding reports on drivers of drinking alcohol and inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking alcohol;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as criminal history;

1. Article 148-2 of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, the selection of a fine, and the selection of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In full view of all the factors such as the records of the same crime as indicated in the grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the degree of alcohol concentration and reflects on the blood of this case, the defendant should retire upon the suspension of the execution of imprisonment as a fixed-term teacher, the circumstances of the crime, the character and conduct of the defendant, and the environment, etc., the sentence shall be determined as ordered.