2. Although the Defendant made a confession of the instant crime, even though there had been the history of punishment several times due to the fraud of the same veterinary method, the Defendant repeated the instant crime, 4 victims by deceiving the amount exceeding KRW 83 million, and thus, did not take any measures for recovery from damage to victims up to the trial, taking into account the following factors: (a) the number of the crimes in the judgment, the frequency of the crimes, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age and behavior environment, and the circumstances before and after the crimes, the lower court’s punishment against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.