beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.01.10 2018고단5979

공문서위조등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Although the tenant D resides in Gangnam-gu Seoul and C (hereinafter referred to as "the apartment of this case"), the Defendant, who is the Defendant’s possession, but did not have the tenant, by forging a detailed statement of perusal of the moving-in household, which is an official document, so that the Defendant would provide the main apartment as security and obtain the loan from the victim E, and then

1. On July 15, 2016, the Defendant forged public document forgery: (a) on the influent land in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the head of the household and a person living together with the head of the household of the household moving into the instant apartment with a white paper attached the part in which the personal information of the tenant of the instant apartment, the date of transfer, etc. is recorded; and (b) as if there was no tenant, the date of issuance was forged one copy of the statement of perusal of the transferred household in the name of the head of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government head of the Dong on July 15,

2. On July 15, 2016, the Defendant: (a) borrowed money from the victim’s office located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G and the 12th floor; and (b) presented that one copy of the detailed statement of the transfer household, which was forged, was issued as if it were genuine.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place stated in paragraph (2), issued to the employee in charge of lending the victim a detailed statement of transfer household inspection that forged the apartment house as stated in paragraph (1) as if the lessee had no lessee.

However, in fact, the apartment house in this case could not be a sufficient security for the victim's loans because the lessee D was residing in the apartment house with the deposit of KRW 430 million.

Nevertheless, the defendant, who belongs to the defendant, was the victim of July 15, 2016, KRW 250,000,000, and the same year.

7. A total of KRW 265,000,000, including KRW 15,000,000, were received and fraudulently acquired.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning suspect interrogation of D (including attached documents);

1. Statement of each police statement about H;

1. A complaint (including attached documents);

1. To inspect and report on investigation, transfer to another household;