2. In light of the following: (a) there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court; and (b) where the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015); (c) there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the lower court’s judgment because new sentencing data have not been submitted in the trial; (d) the defrauded amount of this case exceeds 25 million won; and (e) the Defendant was punished twice due to the crime of property damage, etc., the lower court’s sentencing was too excessive and exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.