Part of violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act due to the provision of severe premiums shall be reversed.

Defendant

A.

A. According to the video materials, etc. attached to a partial investigation report on the part where the game was displayed, provided or stored for use other than the game classified, the game of this case is conducted by manipulating the human character of the main authorized human character into a plastic and tamper to avoid and oppose the attack of the enemy, and by shooting against the enemy. If the external attack of the enemy is met, the human character is destroyed and the game is terminated. However, in fact, the game is classified with the content that the human character is destroyed and the game is finished, but the external character is not destroyed and the game is modified so that the game is continued.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below that acquitted this part of the facts charged is erroneous by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal principles, thereby affecting the conclusion of judgment

나. 경품을 제공하여 사행성을 조장한 부분 이 사건 게임 재사용권은 10,000원 단위의 무기명으로 작성된 점, 고래 또는 상어가 출현하면 30,000원, 80,000원 상당의 점수보관증을 손님에게 직접 제공한 점, 손님들이 환전을 해주지 않는 게임장에 앉아 조작도 하지 않는 게임기에 돈을 넣고 일명 ‘똑딱이’를 설치한 상태로 앉아 있기만 한다는 피고인들 주장이 신빙성이 없는 점, 현재 성행 중인 게임장에서는 점수보관증이 보편화되어 이용자들 사이에 거래를 통한 당첨 점수의 현금화 또는 환전이 이루어지는 점 등의 사정을 고려하면 피고인들이 손님들에게 경품을 제공하여 사행성을 조장한 사실을 인정할 수 있다.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below that acquitted this part of the facts charged is erroneous by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal principles, thereby affecting the conclusion of judgment

2. Determination

A. The lower court, as indicated in its reasoning, displayed and kept game products other than the game products classified, offered for use and provision.