However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On October 13, 2015, from around 23:30 to 23:55, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s main business by force between approximately 25 minutes, including the victim and the employee of the above main shop, on the ground that the victim C was in excess of the drinking value requested by the victim on the ground that he/she was in excess of the drinking value requested by the victim C, and that the victim and the employee of the above main shop were removed from E in order to pay 2.50,000 won, out of the drinking value demanded by the victim, and to pay 4.50,000 won, out of the drinking value demanded by the victim, and the victim and the employee of the above main shop.

2. Upon receiving a report from 112 to the effect that the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the same time, place as paragraph 1, and “the Defendant frighted with the Defendant fright,” the police officer belonging to the police unit G police unit in the Tae Organization G police station, which was called up, demanded the Defendant to return home to the Defendant by the Defendant, the Defendant frighter of the police officer belonging to H and the above fright group, who is an employee of the above frighter, to whom the Defendant:

The term "ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ha, H was the police of the Republic of Korea, and the father of the Republic of Korea was also demanding H to return to the defendant continuously by walking the left math of the H one time to the right edge, and demanding H to return to the defendant continuously.

The South Korean police station was in the strong direction of the South Korean police station.

He shall be off of his clothes.

only 10,000.

“Along with a large voice, the police officer committed an act, such as escape of the person who was suffering from the war, and escape from his/her inner body, thereby hindering police officers from performing their legitimate duties in relation to the prevention, suppression, and investigation of the crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to C and H;

1. - Simplified receipts, - Photographs

1. Application of the G District Work Act 1.