If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant had no intention or ability to pay the price even if he consumes food or drink from the beginning.

Nevertheless, at around 09:00 on May 11, 2012, the Defendant received financial benefits equivalent to the same amount as the Defendant did not pay the amount after making food to the victim C as if he would pay the amount of food to the victim C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A written statement of C;

1. Application of sales slip Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;