beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.02.08 2017노4596

마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are circumstances such as the confession and rebuttal of the Defendant, even though there was the past history of the suspension of indictment for the same kind of crime, the commission of the instant crime, the quantity and frequency of the penphones handled, the active participation in the act of distributing the penphones, the response to the training of the results of the evaluation of the hair has occurred, and all other sentencing circumstances such as the Defendant’s age, sex, sex, family relation, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the Defendant’s punishment imposed by the lower court cannot be deemed unfair, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is rejected.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.