2. The circumstances favorable to the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant appears to have used the benefits arising from each of the instant crimes instead of the benefits arising from the instant crimes, and that the Defendant was breaking his mistake at the latest.

However, in light of all the sentencing conditions, including the fact that the amount of damage caused by each of the instant crimes is reasonable, but the damage has not been recovered at all up to now, the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed to be too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.