However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On May 24, 2018, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) and the Road Traffic Act (drinking without a license) driving a motor vehicle B, while under the influence of alcohol leveling about 0.114%, at the section of approximately 1.5 meters prior to the commercial construction site of the fourth main apartment parking lot located in the Gu-U.S. Do-si in the Gu-si-si Do-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, up to May 24, 2018, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle B, while under the influence of alcohol leveling about 0.114% in front of the commercial construction site.

2. On May 24, 2018, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (do referred to as the “Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes”), and the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Aggravated Punishment”), driving a B rocketing car around 21:03 on May 24, 2018, led the Defendant to proceed with the roads of the third line in front of the Hamno Samsung Samsung Motor Vehicle Maintenance Station, which was located in 438, along the two-lanes of the road from the wing-dong boundary.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately operating the steering direction and brake system and safely driving the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, as set forth in paragraph 1, the Defendant received the victim C (e.g., 51 years old) who was driving in the same lane due to negligence on duty and negligence on the front line while neglecting a driver's license, from the victim C(e.g., 51 years old) who was driving in the same lane, and followed the victim E (e.g., 70 years old) who was driving in the front line of the signal signal, and caused the driver to reewing the F E (n.g., 70 years old), which was driving in the front line, to reewing the passenger car and reewing the horse 6 years old, which was driven by the victim G (e.g., 62 years old) who was driving in the front line of the signal.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the injury to the victim C, such as spawn in a spacule of a spawn whole wall, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment by occupational negligence, and the injury to the victim E, such as spawn, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment, and the victim who is a passenger of the victim G and SM6 car.