However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2017. 9. 15. 06:15 경 서울 영등포구 C에 있는 D 역 3 층 대합실에서 코피를 흘리며 잠을 자고 있던 중 신고를 받고 출동한 119 구급 대원으로부터 응급 처치를 받자 구급 대원에게 욕설을 하며 노상 방뇨를 하였고, 이에 소방 공동 대응 112 신고를 받고 출동한 서울 영등포 경찰서 E 파출소 소속 경장 F으로부터 제지를 당하자 “ 이 씨 발 짭새 새끼들 너희들 다 때려 죽여 버린다.

It is the birth of the Republic of Korea, which is one of the scarbs.

C. While taking a bath to “C. h.”, f.m. assaulted F’s left chest on one occasion by drinking f.m.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. G statements;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. It is not good that the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence is serious enough to prevent the defendant from performing his/her official duties.

However, the sentence was determined by comprehensively taking into account the following factors: (a) the defendant has not been punished as his previous forces; (b) the fact that the defendant has agreed to do so with the victim; (c) the confession and reflection of the crime; and (d) the defendant's age, sexual conduct, circumstances after the crime; and (e) various sentencing conditions that have been shown in the changed theory

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.