2. In light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is divided; (b) the bus mutual aid association is subscribed to; and (c) the Defendant is currently driving engineer is difficult to find economic conditions; (b) the instant crime was committed by the Defendant, who is a means of public transportation, resulting in the Defendant’s deprivation of central line; (c) the degree of violation of the duty of care is not minor; (d) the Defendant was injured by the driver of the vehicle damaged by the instant accident and eight passengers on the bus operated by the Defendant; and (e) the degree of damage of the damaged vehicle was considerably dangerous in light of the damaged vehicle; and (e) other factors of sentencing as indicated in the instant records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, environment, family relationship, health status, criminal records, circumstances after the accident, equity in punishment with other similar cases, etc., the Defendant’s punishment against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.