beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.05.25 2016고합560

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

Defendants are not guilty.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. Article 1 of the selective charges No. 1) Defendant A is a person who, from March 1, 2014 to April 11, 2016, operates a business establishment similar to “H” in the name of “H” by employing 4 partitions with a string and a shower room in the size of 99 square meters ( approximately 30 square meters) located in Gyeyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Yangyang-gu, Seoul from March 1, 2014.

On April 11, 2016, the defendant found the above businesses around 21:50 on April 21, 2016, thereby allowing a male guest to receive KRW 100,000 in return for the similarity with G, an employee, and arranging sexual traffic.

2) Defendant B, while working as a camera in the date and time indicated in the preceding paragraph, notified a male guest who found the said business at the said business place to be a place where the said business place is able to read “Handbling” as meaning the act of similarity. Defendant B, in return for the act of similarity from the said customer, assisted sexual traffic by allowing a male guest to engage in acts of similarity with employees G after receiving KRW 100,000 won from the said customer, thereby allowing him to engage in the act of similarity with employees G.

3) Defendant C 1 arranged sexual traffic for business purposes by having male customers who found the above business place while substantially controlling the business and employees of the above business place operated by Defendant A at the time and place indicated in the above paragraph (1).

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

B. Defendant A provided a place of sexual traffic for business purposes by allowing the act of similarity as described in paragraph (1) 1 of the above A to be conducted.

2) Defendant B provided a place of sexual traffic for business purposes by allowing Defendant B to perform acts similar to those described in the above A-mentioned paragraph (2).

3) Defendant C provided places of sexual traffic for business purposes by allowing Defendant C to perform acts similar to those described in the above paragraph (3).

In this respect.