beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.01.25 2016나2030164

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The court's explanation of this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, this case is quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The part to be removed or added was 6-7 of the judgment of the court of first instance, which read as follows: “In the presentation, the Defendant explained at that presentation, as follows:

At the second bottom, two parallels of “consigning the goods supply agreement (Evidence A4) with the Defendant” are as follows: “Conclusion of an agreement on the supply of goods (Evidence A4) and a transport agreement (Evidence A3) with the content that the goods are supplied by the Defendant and the goods are entrusted by the Defendant to perform the logistics business.”

The third-party 13-15 acts are as follows.

A person shall be appointed.

E. Following the change of trade name, the Plaintiff entered into a trade agreement with the Defendant on October 1, 2014 (only applicable to a contract under which the agreement on the consignment of goods was renewed, as well as the transport agreement entered into earlier; hereinafter “instant consignment of goods”); and on October 2, 2014 (only applicable to a contract under which the agreement on the supply of goods entered into prior to the conclusion of the agreement; hereinafter “instant trade agreement”).

The main contents of their agreements are as follows:

Part 5, 16, "However, the defendant," referring to "the plaintiff," but referring to "a specific type of termination" of the 6th line to "a specific type". From the bottom of the 8th line to the 9th line, the "business employee" of the 1st line from the 1st to the 9th 1st 7th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth g.:

(See Supreme Court Decision 2007Da23425 delivered on August 23, 2007, 2007) Nos. 9 and 8 through 16 are as follows.