【The Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment with labor for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Young-gu District Court Support on May 22, 2013, and completed the execution of the sentence in Daejeon Prison on April 7, 2016.

【Criminal facts” around 09:00 on April 25, 2016, the Defendant entered the victim D’s house located in Gongju-si, 09:00, and examined the victim’s “water,” and then entered the victim’s house with a view to carrying out a farming work without any doubt, and then stolen the victim’s house as it is, with a sum of KRW 66,250, total sum of the franchis and franchis contained in the television front of the television area.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Reports on the seizure of each police station, reports on each investigation, and written appraisal of suspect fingerprints;

1. Explanation of each photograph, on-site photographing basic information;

1. Previous convictions: The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquire about criminal history and report criminal investigations;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes [the scope of recommendations] The reason for sentencing of Article 35 of the Criminal Act for general property [the scope of punishment] is the defendant who is the same repeated crime and the criminal punishment for the same kind of repeated crime not falling under the area of mitigation (the special mitigation (special mitigation) (the special mitigation) of imprisonment between August and January 6) [the defendant] of the mitigated area of punishment (the special mitigation (the special mitigation)] of life penalty/specific (the decision of punishment], and it is inevitable for the defendant to have

However, it shall be considered that the defendant is led to confession, is in depth, and the amount of damage is a small amount.

In this context, considering various circumstances such as the defendant's age, sex, circumstances of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the punishment is determined as ordered.