beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.02.15 2014고정3238

위증

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From August 1, 2011, the Defendant is the employee of H, a corporation that received a contract for the operation and management of the foregoing “F” from G, a corporation operating a four-day shop in the name of “F” in the E department store, etc.

On December 21, 2012, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath in Seoul Central District Court Decision 557, Seoul Central District Court Decision 557, in Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, as a witness of the above court case No. 2012Ga group 43636, and the above court case No. 123761, a group 123761 (Counterclaim) brought by G against H Co., Ltd., the Defendant appeared and taken an oath, and “from January to October 15, 2012, the Defendant educates the new manager of the Defendant at his own expense.”

“The Plaintiff’s agent is not “the Plaintiff’s question.”

At the time, I would like to educate the Defendant Company's own managers.

“The answer was made.”

However, the facts are as follows: (a) from October 1, 201 to October 15, 201, G provided education to the above “F” managers, a corporation H, at its expense; and (b) did not provided education to the above store managers at H.

Nevertheless, the defendant made a false statement contrary to memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the witness examination protocol to the witness I of this court;

1. To make a statement to the accused in part of the third police interrogation protocol;

1. Protocol of examination of witness (Seoul Central District Court 2012Ga group 43636, group 2012Ga group 123761);

1. Application of statutes on contract for work;

1. Article 152 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The summary of the facts charged in this part of the charge under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is as follows: (a) the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the claim for damages at the time, place, and where the facts charged are stated in the judgment; and (b) the J representative director of H on October 11, 201.