beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.02.13 2014고단1317

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2014 Highest 1317"

1. The Defendants’ co-principal

A. On June 21, 2014, the Defendants violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint injury) 01:20 on the street before the “E convenience store” located in the Gangnam-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, and Defendant B saw the victim F (the age of 23) who was a customer of the above convenience store. Defendant B saw the victim’s breath by bombing the breath, provokinging the victim’s breath, provokinging the victim’s breath, and threatening the breath’s disease, and the Defendant b satdd the victim’s breath by making a joint b

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the victim, such as climatic salt, which requires approximately 21 days of treatment.

B. The Defendants in violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint assault) assaulted F at the time and place mentioned in the above paragraph (a) as mentioned above. The victim G (22 years of age) and the victim H (22 years of age) were saluted by F, Defendant B took 2 to 3 times by saluting the victim’s bridge and belbow with the victim’s bomb, and Defendant A saluted the victim’s h’s bridge and belbel with the victim’s balut, and Defendant A saluted the victim’s bel with the two hand.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted victims.

2. Defendant B, at the date, time, place, as described in paragraph (1) of this Article, committed assault by the victim J (S) who was a slope belonging to the 112 police box, in response to the above assault case, sent out after receiving a report of 112, arrested the above A in flagrant offender and was in front of the victim’s clothes in order to stop the act of assault, such as cutting down the victim’s clothes and blocking the victim’s clothes.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the handling of the 112 reported case by police officers and legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

3. The defendant A was arrested of a flagrant offender as described in Paragraph (1) and at the time, at the place, as described in Paragraph (2) on the charge of the above assault, and was born to the back seat of the said I patrol vehicle (K) and the H as described in Paragraph (1) is called "low brut bom" and the back seat of the patrol vehicle as head.