근로기준법위반등
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged is the representative director of C of a stock company with Nos. 104 102 and 103 of the B building 104 dong 104 and 103, who is an employer who engages in environmental measuring instruments and fuel cell manufacturing by making use
From May 6, 2008 to February 25, 2013, the Defendant, while working in the said workplace, had not paid two workers, including 16,912,180 won in total, such as wages of 3,458,670 won in October 2012, income tax refunds of 1,140,530 won in income tax and retirement allowances of 8,598,535 won in the said workplace from October 5, 201 to May 9, 2012, including 558,340 won in income tax refunds of E, and 27,209,585 won in total, within 14 days from the date of each retirement without agreement on the extension of the due date.
2. Subparagraph 6 of Article 327 of the Criminal Procedure Act (the victims E on November 12, 2013 and the victims D respectively are not punished on November 26, 2013).