Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On January 8, 2016, from around 21:55 to 22:02 of the same day, the Defendant obstructed the business of the victimized person’s bread accommodation by force, such as: (a) resisting employees, such as the victim E (V, 19 years old), etc., of glutinous rice, on the ground that the Defendant dbbbin house located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from around January 8, 2016 to around 22:02, on the ground that he wnds down the glutinous rice booms compared to other bread.

Summary of Evidence

1. Written statements (E);

1. A report on investigation (DCC Twit investigation);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (the F counterpart investigation of shots);

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;