If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

피고인은 2016. 6. 17. 22:50 경 경기 광주시 B에 있는 C 음식점 앞 도로에서 대리 운전기사와 시비를 벌이던 중, 112 신고를 받고 출동한 광주 경찰서 D 지구대 소속 경찰 관인 피해자 E으로부터 사건 경위를 문의 받자 화가 나 F 등 3명이 듣는 자리에서 피해자에게 “ 야, 씨 발 놈들 아, 왜 이제야 씨 발, 짭새 개새끼들아, 니들 대리기사랑 한패거리네, 씨 발 놈 아 ”라고 크게 소리쳤다.

Accordingly, in order to arrest the defendant as an offender in the current crime of insult, the defendant was faced with the face of the victim one time by her head.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insulting the victim, and interfered with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Investigation reports (on-site situations, etc.);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment (the punishment is against each other, and the degree of crime is minor, etc. is considered);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;