If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On July 21, 2015, the Defendant, along with B, may impose a lot of money on the victim C at a mutually infinite coffee shop in front of the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Si, and the Defendant may impose a lot of money on the victim C.

The farm, which had been cultivated before the duringception, is the head of the family, and the main owner of the dry field B.

B The dry field was changed to KRW 4,50,000 on the condition that it was borrowed for two years, and the above B was done as if it was the subject of dry field located in the above Ho Lake.

However, even if the Defendant received money from the injured party, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to lease the dry field located in the Ho Lake, and the above B was not the subject of the dry field.

The Defendant, in collusion with B, received KRW 2 million from the victim by deceiving him/her as such, to the SC Bank Account (D) in the name of 16:52 A on July 21, 2015 from the victim, and received delivery of KRW 2 million from the victim.

7.27. It received 700,000 won in total by delivery to the same account.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial entry of a protocol concerning the suspect examination of the police against the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (the submission by the complainant of a statement of bank transactions);

1. Relevant Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 347 of the Criminal Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines concerning the crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;