A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendants jointly committed the crime at the E main point in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, on May 12, 2014, at around 02:12:0, and Defendant B took care of a woman under the name of the contacter due to the two main diseases; however, as he was prevented from the victim F (the age of 29), the victim’s right of 4 to 5 walk the victim’s right of streak due to the streak, and Defendant A took care of the victim’s right of streak, and the victim’s right of streak by walkinging the victim’s left right right of streak on one occasion due to the combination with it, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as the streak and the streak of the bridge, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

2. Defendant A

A. At the time and place indicated in Paragraph 1, the Defendant received the Defendant’s report that he was frighting to the main employee under the influence of alcohol, and obstructed the Defendant’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the police officer’s suppression of crime and the maintenance of public order, etc. by committing violence, such as assaulting and drinking the main employee, and committing assaulting the Defendant, thereby obstructing the police officer’s performance of duties on the police officer’s control and maintenance of public order.

B. On May 20, 2014, around 04:10 on May 20, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was arrested as a flagrant offender due to the crime described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of this Article; and (b) detained in the cell of the Incheon Southern Police Station located in 668, Nam-dong, Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, as the South-dong Police Station was detained; (c) the Defendant was able to carry out an investigation at around 04:40 on the same day; and (d) 2 locks installed at the entrance of the said protective detention room, which was 2 to 3 times away from the entrance.

Accordingly, the defendant has harmed the utility of goods used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

【Paragraph 1 of this Article】

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1.The police of F. F.