도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. On November 26, 2017, the Defendant: (a) on violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) driven a C-learning car under the influence of alcohol content 0.096% while under the influence of alcohol content 0.096%, from around 23:00 around November 26, 2017 to around 3km from Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Dongdaemun market to the front road of Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul.
2. On September 2017, the Defendant embezzled the lost driver’s license of a motor vehicle in the Vietnam-dong, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City and embezzled it as he/she had without taking necessary procedures, such as discovering the victim D’s license and returning it to the victim.
3. On November 26, 2017, the Defendant on the unlawful uttering of official document presented the official document indicating that he/she completed the driver’s license for D’s license issued by the Seoul Central Police Agency, which is an official document embezzled to a slope F, a police officer, who is a police officer who exercises control over driving by drinking and demands identification card on the front side of Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Seoul), and was in possession of the official document embezzled as in the preceding paragraph, and presented it to him/her as the driver’s license for himself/herself.
4. The Defendant: (a) drafted a notice of the results of drinking driving control on D using a portable information device (PDA) at the same time, at the same time, at the same place as the foregoing paragraph 3; (b) signed the driver’s signature on the driver’s signature column, signed the “D” on the driver’s signature column; (c) forged the driver’s signature column in the above name, which is the private electronic document pertaining to the factual verification; and (d) presented the above F, who may know of the fact, the electronic record was authentic.
Accordingly, for the purpose of making administrative affairs smooth, the Defendant forged the electronic records of others on fact certification, and exercised the electronic records of the above author.
5. The Defendant, at the same time, at the same place as the preceding three paragraphs, and at a slope F.