beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.04.03 2014노4233

모욕

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Although the court below did not take a bath to F police officers, who are victims of the gist of the grounds for appeal, it erred in the misapprehension of facts, thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The following circumstances, i.e., the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., the victim: (a) from the investigation stage to the court below, “F first received a report from the defendant, but no particular statement was made; (b) more than one hour and 30 minutes have passed; (c) the defendant again received a report from the defendant and called out upon the defendant; and (d) the defendant expressed that he had expressed a desire to do so in the manner of expressing the police officer’s complaint regarding the handling of the case; and (b) G, who was employed at the site of the above victim, also at the investigation stage to the court below from the investigation stage to the court below, “I would like to be too f and I would like to be treated as f.e., “I would like to be treated as f., f., d., son at the time of insult; (c) the victim and G, the police officer under the circumstances at the time of insult, did not appear to have any specific and reasonable grounds for the defendant’s testimony at the time of insult.

Therefore, it is true.