When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant, in return for money, agreed to transfer the means of access to another, and B conspired to identify the place where the Defendant would transfer the means of access.

According to the above public offering, the Defendant: (a) opened one head of a Tong, physical card, and one OTP connected to the account under the name of the Defendant to B in the vicinity of the Osan Station located at the early December 2016, 2016; (b) informed the Internet banking ID and password; and (c) around that time, the Defendant opened the Internet banking ID and password to the names poor who became aware of through the Internet search at the unspecified place.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with B to transfer the means of access.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police interrogation protocol on the accused and B;

1. E’s authentic statement and written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes certifying details of deposits transactions;

1. Relevant Article 49(4)1 and Article 6(3)1 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines for criminal facts, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;