When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant, from January 8, 2015 to around 01:42 of the same day, found the convenience store operated by the victim C of the neighboring apartment located in Mapo-si B from January 8, 2015 to around 01:42 of the same day as a customer, and the said convenience store employee D only 1 per person of tobacco.

The victim's convenience store operation was obstructed by the threat of approximately 25 minutes, such as 'grading down the death of the dog', and threatening it.

"2015 High 1041"

1. On August 3, 2015, the Defendant: (a) reported the Defendant to 112 on the ground that G operating the “F main point” located in Sinpo-si E on August 3, 2015 and the said G was a Sinpo-si (hereinafter referred to as “F main point”); (b) the Defendant did not calculate the drinking value in front of the said route.

The Defendant: (a) on the ground that the victim I, the police officer of the Military Military Police Station HH police station, called upon the above report, demanded G to pay the alcohol value and return home to G; (b) on the ground that the victim, the police officer of the Military Police Station HH station, who was called upon the above report, demanded the victim to “I am bit of bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch, bitch.”

In a large sound, “the victim was openly insulting.”

2. The Defendant in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, on August 3, 2015, arrested a flagrant offender on the charge as described in paragraph (1) around 01:20 on August 3, 2015, and was under custody in the Hdistrict located in theJ in the Mapopo-si, Mapo-si. The Defendant is fluoring that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol to four police officers working for the said police officer I, and that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol to the four other police officers working for the Mapo-si, Mapo-do;

For about 1 hour and 30 minutes, such as taking a bath for Gain, the instant H District, a government office, performed an act of disturbance in the main place.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of some of the police officers against the accused;

1. Application of the laws and regulations on police statements made to C and I

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, Article 3(3) of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act.