The Defendant, at around 12:00 on August 16, 2016, 8-1 platform operators of the Central Station, 918, as at the center of the members of the Ansan-si, Ansan-si, the Defendant, as at the end of the 8-1 platform operator, and as at the end, the Victim C (V, 21 years old) wishing to sit to an objection, there is no “furne” between the Defendant and the Defendant.

For the reason that the victim raised an objection against the defect, such as "", he/she assaulted the victim on the part of the victim's left face on one occasion with his/her own hand on the part of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness C and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victims;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts that the defendant's judgment and defense counsel's assertion of the selective detention type selection of punishment and the defendant's assertion that the victim's speech that the victim would feel insulting, and that the defendant's face in order to escape from such situation is light and constitutes a legitimate defense.

However, according to the evidence adopted and examined by this court, the defendant's face is not less light to the victim's face, but can be recognized as having been relatively stronged by the victim. The defendant's act cannot be viewed as a passive resistance, and the defendant's defense counsel's above assertion is not accepted.

Reasons for sentencing