Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

1. Defendant A is the actual operator of Company B, which is located in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Building D.

A manufacturer or importer of products for children subject to safety verification shall undergo a safety test or inspection from a testing or inspection agency designated for each model of the product for children subject to safety verification, and verify that the relevant product for children conforms to safety standards, and shall report it to the Minister of Trade, Industry and Energy, as prescribed by Ordinance of Ministry of Industry and Energy.

Nevertheless, around December 2016, the Defendant imported approximately 200 children E-wing products, which are products for children subject to safety verification, from the testing and inspection agency designated by the above corporation B, without undergoing safety verification.

2. Defendant B, a real representative of the Defendant, committed a violation as described in paragraph 1 at the time and place specified in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of products;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 41(1)12 and Article 22(1) of the Special Act on the Safety of Products for Children; Selection of a fine

(b) Defendant B: the main sentence of Article 42 of the Special Act on the Safety of Products for Children, Articles 41(1)12 and 22(1)

1. Defendant A who is detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act