On May 10, 2015, at around 14:05, the Defendant met the victim D (59 years old) who was a tree in the place of alcohol, as he interfered with other field employees' work under the influence of alcohol.

Defendant 1, as seen above, was divided into the victim’s attitude, to see whether “Chewing”;

Is the person in charge, Gara Mala;

Chewing, in which case any guye is guy;

A person with the same mind that he had no national property, and assaulted the victim by breathing the breath of the victim's breath with his hand, and drinking the victim's face and drinking water.

2. We examine the judgment. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act. According to Article 260(3) of the same Act, the case in which a public prosecution cannot be instituted against the victim’s explicit intent. According to the witness D’s legal statement, the victim D can be acknowledged as having withdrawn his/her wish to punish the Defendant on March 10, 2016, which was after the prosecution of the instant case. Thus, the prosecution of the instant case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.