beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2020.12.24 2019가합114905

명예회복 등 청구의 소

Text

All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant, as a party, was working at the FK International University Students Association since 2016, and around 2017, the Plaintiff was the 12th student president of the FK and the Defendant’s executive member.

B. The Defendant’s publication of the Defendant’s Pest North writing and the Grand Note 1) The Defendant is a Kakao Stockholm group reading room in the 12th student conference execution department of the 12th student conference in Pyeongtaek (hereinafter “instant group reading room”).

(2) The Defendant posted five times from May 26, 2018 to June 4, 2018, a notice stating that the Plaintiff’s act of misunderstanding sexual harassment, such as “adial-a-a-a-the-job”, and that the Defendant’s face was unreasonable. The Defendant reported the Plaintiff to the Total Female Students’ Association on March 11, 2018, and to the Gender Equality Counseling Center of the F University on May 2, 2018.

Among the writing published by the defendant, the contents of the plaintiff's question are as follows:

(이하 ‘이 사건 제 부분’이라 하고, 제1 내지 5부분을 총칭하여 ’이 사건 각 부분‘이라 한다). 구분 내용 제1부분 2018. 5. 26.자 1차 게시글 중 학생회실에 비치되어있던 베개로 성기묘사를 하질 않나, 페이스북 공식 학생회 계정 운영의 장점을 예쁜 애들 계정 염탐하는 것이라 하질 않나 (중략) 2017년 말 A는 국제대 선관위장 자격으로 성인지 교육에 참석했고, 강사님께서 단톡방 성희롱은 내부고발자가 나서줘야한다는 얘기를 하고 계신 와중에 본인을 당당히 단톡방 성희롱 가해자라고 지목하며 무려 여자친구와의 카톡까지 내게 보여주면서 ‘섹스’를 공지로 설정했다며 뻔뻔하게 자랑했었다.

On May 29, 2018, it is thought that the proposal is a problem in the 4th bulletin of May 29, 2018, A's sexual harassment (comprehion) of the student president A should not make sexual harassment targets only in gender-sensitive education.