2. The following facts are considered: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is divided; and (b) the equity should be taken into account when the judgment was rendered at the same time with the case of fraud subject to punishment in 2010; (c) on the other hand, the deception of the instant crime is bad; and (d) the instant crime has not been recovered from damage even after the lapse of more than five years since the instant crime was committed; and (e) the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, circumstances after the crime was committed, and all the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and arguments, including the circumstances after the crime, cannot be said to be heavier.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.