When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 7, 2016, the Defendant provided 151,000 won (including inspection expenses, total of 250,000 won) under the name of the fee and received an unlawful inspection, even though the Defendant’s E New Telecommunications Truck truck operated by the Defendant cannot pass the comprehensive inspection standard because it was loaded on the cargo vehicle due to its unlawful alteration (out of length).

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. A protocol concerning the police and suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Copies of the police record and the examination of suspects by the prosecution against F;

1. Copy of the business place;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (to hear statements from a witness G phone);

1. Article 80 of the relevant Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Articles 80 subparagraph 3 and 45-2 (1) of the Automobile Management Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;