2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 9, 2011, the Defendant issued a summary order of a fine of one million won at the Cheongju District Court for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, and the same year.

7. 15. Around March 14, 2014, when a summary order of KRW 2,50,000 was issued by the Jung-gu District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, the vehicle B was driven from approximately KRW 500 meters to the front road of the entrance of Pyeongtaek-dong Ga Gam Sticket Gamscam, which was driven under the influence of alcohol at KRW 0.185% of the blood alcohol concentration on March 14, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on probation and order to attend the course of education is that there is no room for wife in that the defendant was driving a motor vehicle under the same type of punishment power in the name of two times and reached the crime of this case. However, in depth, there is no penalty force exceeding the fine, and the defendant's age, character and conduct, and circumstances after the crime were considered.