However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 7, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 19:50 on the ground that the victim D, who had a relationship with the Defendant in front of the Gangdong-gu Seoul Building, was not married to the Defendant, was able to obtain the victim’s head debt, and was towed by the male toilet disabled partitions on the first floor, and prevented the victim from going out of the victim for about 20 minutes after leaving the door.

Accordingly, the defendant detained the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Relevant Article 276 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 276 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [the type of decision] The general standard for arrest, detention and confinement [the person subject to special sentencing] element of mitigation of punishment: [the scope of recommendation] mitigation area / [the scope of recommendation] reduction area / [the decision of sentence] January to August / [the decision of sentence] punishment / the defendant's contents and circumstances after committing the crime are not good; the defendant's records of punishment several times of violence crimes are disadvantageous to others; the defendant's admission of and against the crime; the defendant's acceptance of and against the crime; the defendant's smooth agreement with the victim; and other favorable circumstances such as the defendant's smooth agreement with the victim.

Rejection of Public Prosecution

1. Around June 7, 2017, the summary of the facts charged: (a) around 19:50 on the ground that the victim D, who had a relationship with the Defendant in front of the Seoul Gangdong-gu Seoul Building, was not married to the Defendant, the Defendant threatened the victim by putting him/her the head of the victim’s head, leading him/her into the male toilet disability partitions on the first floor, leading him/her to the victim’s head, leading him/her into the victim’s head, and her to the victim’s head, thereby threatening him/her.

2. The part concerning the above facts charged is an offense falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act.

In this regard, the injured person does not want the punishment of the defendant.