If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

At around 14:00 on April 7, 2015, the Defendant destroyed one of urban gas measuring instruments by leaving the market value of urban gas measuring instruments installed with the victim D's permission on his own wall in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, and preventing the use of urban gas through E, a controlled employee of the said measuring instrument.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. The prosecutor's office and the police's statement concerning D;

1. Photographs of crimes;

1. Application of investigation reports, investigation reports (investigations related to urban gas measuring instruments), telephone communications of urban gas business operators, investigation reports (investigation into the price of urban gas measuring instruments), and reporting on telephone communications of urban gas business operators, and reporting on criminal investigations (in-depth E and reporting on recording recording

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 366 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the claim of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act alleged that the defendant's act constitutes a justifiable act that does not violate social rules and thus constitutes a legitimate act that does not violate social rules. However, in light of the motive and circumstance of this case acknowledged by the evidence above, the defendant's act does not constitute a justifiable act that does not violate social rules.

Therefore, the defendant and his defense counsel cannot be accepted.