except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 17:00 on May 3, 2012, the Defendant appeared and testified as a witness in relation to the case of violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents against the Busan District Court Decision 304, the Busan District Court Decision 304, 2012, Da-39, etc.

On November 3, 201, at least 02:00, the Defendant was negligent in changing the two-lanes from the intersection to the United Nations intersection at a speed of about 55 kilometers from the parallel parallel to the two-lanes, and neglected the front and rear intersection space at a speed of about 55 kilometers, while driving an Obato with no Obato where C does not have a margin, and the Defendant was able to suffer from the injury of four oba on the left side of C, and the Defendant was able to receive from the rear side of the Obato where C was driving at the time, and the Defendant was aware of the circumstances that C was boarding the rear seat at the time, and thus, he was given a false statement to the effect that “A driver was memoryed on the Obato in the upper part of the C driving and then changed the two-lanes to the latter one.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Protocol of examination of the witness (D, A);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes (Jinsan District Court's East Branch Court's 2012 High Court's 39 and Busan District Court's 2012No2350);

1. Relevant Article 152(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (a) does not contain any previous convictions against the defendant, nor does it affect the result of the trial of the case that the defendant testified; and