업무방해등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
The judgment below
During the third and fourth conduct, “1. Aggravations for concurrent crimes: the Criminal Act.
The gist of the grounds for appeal by the defendant is that the punishment imposed by the court below (the punishment amount of eight million won) is too excessive and unfair, but in full view of the various circumstances, which are the conditions for sentencing as shown in this case, the punishment imposed by the court below is too excessive and unfair, and the above argument is without merit.
Accordingly, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is clear that the entry of “1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes: Aggravation of concurrent crimes: the omission of entry of “Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Procedure Act” has been made during the 3th and 4th of the judgment of the court below. Thus, it is corrected to add it ex officio in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure.