beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.05.31 2016가단210242

구상금

Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The status of the parties is the owner and driver of B Truck (hereinafter “instant truck”). Defendant Han Lan Insurance Co., Ltd. is the insurer who concluded an insurance contract for the instant truck with Defendant A. The Plaintiff is a juristic person that provided insurance benefits for occupational accidents to C, who is an employee of the rice farming association corporation, for which the Plaintiff provided insurance benefits for industrial accident.

At around 07:30 on May 30, 2013, Defendant A brought a lawsuit on the steel rink loaded on the instant truck (hereinafter “instant case”) and brought a lawsuit against Defendant A as a slaughterhouse located in the D joint wholesale market.

The instant case is in the shape of a rectangular body as follows, and is installed or dismantled in such a way as to string the pole or string the string.

Defendant A, after having brought a lawsuit at the above slaughterhouse, string the columns of the instant case into a string of the instant truck, entered the instant truck into the third vice president, who was in the said joint wholesale market.

C, who had been on the third Deputy Director, entered the instant truck into the third Deputy Director, and changed to the instant truck.

Defendant A stopped the instant truck and laid it on the instant truck after having string off, and C took the head on the pole of the dismantled.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”). C suffered the injury of which the entire site is cut down due to the instant accident with the alley and a slopings.

C. By April 4, 2017, the Plaintiff paid C the aggregate of KRW 317,40,610 in the amount of medical care benefits, 252,812,190, temporary disability compensation benefits, 38,095,810, and the injury and disease pension 26,498,610, as insurance benefits.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8, 13, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 (including numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), defendant A's personal examination result, and the plaintiff's assertion of the whole purport of the pleading is appropriate for defendant A to have caused the instant case's columns.