A. As to the Plaintiff A’s KRW 131,550,000 and its amount, Defendant C from May 17, 2016. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 27515, Sep. 17, 2016>

A. The relationship between the parties 1) Defendant C had been operating the store with the trade name “E” in Gangnam-gu Seoul, and Defendant D, as Defendant C’s believers, has participated in the performance of the rights of trust held by Defendant C and has received daily allowances from Defendant C. 2) The Plaintiffs sought to find Defendant C to find out whether the Plaintiff was able to seek a new workplace in the actual condition of Plaintiff C around August 2006, on the ground that Defendant C ought to receive the performance of the rights of trust, and that Defendant C should receive a new workplace after the completion of the performance of the rights of trust.

B. From December 3, 2013 to May 17, 2016, Plaintiff C paid KRW 131,50,00 as follows. The amount of the temporary payment of the Bank of Korea (“Plaintiff”) demanded KRW 50,000,000 on December 3, 2013; KRW 50,000 on May 1, 200; KRW 05,00 on May 1, 201, Plaintiff C demanded KRW 05,00 on May 1, 200; KRW 05,00 on May 20, 205; KRW 05,00 on May 30, 201; and KRW 05,00 on May 30, 201; and KRW 05,00 on May 1, 200, 200 on May 14, 201.

B. On December 5, 2015, the traffic accident occurred due to Plaintiff B’s failure to perform the duty of care on December 23, 2015, following the Plaintiff B’s failure to perform the duty of care on December 5, 2015. On November 23, 2015, Plaintiff B demanded compensation by deeming that the crossing amount of Plaintiff B was large. On December 28, 2015, Plaintiff B’s failure to perform the duty of care on December 28, 2015, Plaintiff B demanded compensation of KRW 32,00,000,000, when Plaintiff B’s failure to perform the duty of care on the part of Plaintiff B’s failure to receive the heavy credit. < Amended by Act No. 1320, Dec. 28, 2015; Act No. 13200, Oct. 32, 2000>