beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.06.19 2014고단1686

교통사고처리특례법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the driver of the frozen trucking vehicle B.

On April 8, 2014, at around 17:20, the Defendant: (a) went to an intersection in violation of three-lanes of the distance crossing in front of the traffic signal, such as the “Womed Sea” in Gwangju Northern-gu, and carried out the intersection in line with the signal in the direction of mountain and water flow along the four-lanes of the front side of the four-lanes of the road, the Defendant, from the right right side of the road to the left side of the pedestrian C (the age of 9) who has a crosswalk in accordance with the crosswalk signals, was shocked from the left side of the road to the right side of the vehicle of the Defendant’s driver’s freight, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as cutting the frame and closing of the upper frame, which requires six-

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A traffic accident statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of the investigation report (Submission of a medical certificate), medical certificate-C Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1), Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is to cause the instant traffic accident by gross negligence, i.e., the Defendant’s violation of signal signals and the violation of duty to protect pedestrians at crosswalks, the traffic accident in this case causes the instant traffic accident, and the Defendant’s fault in depth and reflects the Defendant’s fault, and the Defendant’s vehicle was covered by comprehensive insurance. In particular, on May 28, 2014, the Defendant was covered by comprehensive insurance with parents of the victim, and the victim did not wish to punish the Defendant; the Defendant was the first offender with no criminal power; the Defendant’s age, character, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime; and all other circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing as shown in the pleadings in the instant case, including the circumstances after the crime.