On January 12, 201, while serving as a director at a D Co., Ltd. established by the former C military, etc. (hereinafter “D”), the Defendant was dismissed at a D temporary general meeting of shareholders held by the C military health clinic on January 12, 201, and filed a lawsuit to revoke a request for reexamination and a decision to revoke a decision to dismiss unfair dismissal, but all of the appeals were dismissed, the Defendant was willing to submit a false complaint to the effect that C military health center E and D representative director F et al. conspired with C military health center employees G and D directors, etc. to keep the Defendant from attending the general meeting of shareholders and dismissed the Defendant by opening the general meeting of shareholders.

Therefore, on November 1, 2016, at the PC room where it is difficult to identify the trade name in South Korea, the Defendant prepared a complaint to the effect that “at least two hours in the meeting room of the third floor of the C military public health clinic of C/Gun on January 12, 2011, the Defendant committed acts of systematic confinement, such as forced suppression of the complainant’s free will and free physical activities, and forced suppression of toilets,” using the computer, and submitted it to the Gwangju regional public health office located in 7-12 around the 16th day of the same month.

In addition, around December 5, 2016, the Defendant made a statement at the C police station investigation and a strong 1 team office located south M, and added H to the Defendant Nonparty Nonparty. G and H met the body for two hours from the Defendant’s side at the above conference room to prevent the Defendant from going out of the room, and the remaining Defendants conspired with the above G and H to punish the Defendant.

However, G and H did not have any fact that the Defendant was prevented from leaving the meeting room. At the time, there were several employees other than the Defendant, G, and H, but there was no special fact that access was controlled.

Thus, the defendant's 7 persons who are the above defendant shall be subject to criminal punishment as above is false.