However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 2017, the Defendant came to know of the victim B (the age of 17) through the Internet game “tethner” (the age of 2017) and got a photograph of high level of exposure to the victim by threatening the victim to receive a photograph of the video file, which is located down on the bucket, from the victim, after having exchanged the victim with the victim and the Kakakao Stockholm Stockholm, and cell phone numbers, and communicating with the victim.

The defendant from September 16, 2017

9. From the 17th day to the Cheongju, the victim sent pictures to the cell phone or Kakakao Stockholm on several occasions via the Kakao Stockholm, “I wish to send pictures to the victim. If you do not send the pictures, I will spread the pictures sent by N.N.” The victim sent to another Kakao Stockholm Stockholm Stockholm Stockholm account to the victim “I would unfold the original account if I would unfold it, I would put the pictures sent by N.N. on the Poto square,” and “I would turn off the pictures sent by N.N. if I would unfold the original account, I would go against the victim.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. B written statements;

1. Investigative reports (to hear statements from victims);

1. Egnis of the letters posted by the principal and the application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the photograph of the victim;

1. Relevant Article 283 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the fact that the commission of the crime and the mistake are contradictory to the fact that there is no record of punishment

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the victim is a minor child, the defendant is aware of such circumstances, and the victim's photograph is posted on the Internet, and the crime of this case is not very good.