beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.04.21 2012가단5145797

손해배상(의)

Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On February 10, 2010, Plaintiff A was subject to the X-ray test at the Defendant Kangwon University Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”)’s emergency room as it fell from a height of one meter during which Plaintiff A was in the public abortion.

Defendant F of Defendant F’s major of the Defendant Hospital diagnosed as the left-hand pelvis (at the time, there was an aggregate above 1/3 of the left-hand pelvis) and made an domination and dialogal pelvis.

(A) After the x-ray test, the production of approximately 15 degrees was remaining, and the degree of the Plaintiff’s age is about 10 degrees. (The degree of 10 degrees of permitted maintenance degree after the x-raying of the Plaintiff’s age.)

On February 19, 2010, Defendant G’s medical doctor of the Defendant Hospital implemented tiny measures against Plaintiff A on February 19, 2010. As a result, the degree of formation of X-ray was 15 degrees.

On February 26, 2010, the degree of 25 degrees was observed. (C)

On March 17, 2010, Defendant G changed the course of study to the course of study for the first time, and changed it to the course of study for the second time on April 30, 2010.

Plaintiff

A visited the Defendant Hospital on July 5, 201, 201. According to the X-ray shooting on July 13, 201, A visited the left-hand son, and the results of X-ray shooting on July 13, 2011, following the observation: (a) the indeption of the embling of the embris (20 degrees of the embling part of the embris) and the indeption of the embs of the embris-embris (an increase in the interval of the embriss of the embriss of the embris), Defendant G implemented the correction embris and the metal embrising (the embrising part of the embris found to be corrected) on July 14, 2011.

(In physical appraisal procedures implemented on July 23, 2013 at the request of this Court after the surgery, each transformation was assessed to be less than five degrees).

Plaintiff

A discharged around July 20, 201, and thereafter at the defendant hospital four times.